پديد آورنده :
خرمي، مجتبي
عنوان :
ارزيابي تغذيه اي پلت چسبان پروتئيني و تعيين بهترين سطح جايگزيني آن با پودر ماهي در جيره جوجه هاي گوشتي
مقطع تحصيلي :
كارشناسي ارشد
محل تحصيل :
اصفهان: دانشگاه صنعتي اصفهان، دانشكده كشاورزي
صفحه شمار :
يازده، 69، [II] ص.: جدول
يادداشت :
ص. ع. به فارسي و انگليسي
استاد راهنما :
جواد پوررضا، عبدالحسين سميع
استاد مشاور :
مهدي محمد علي پور
توصيفگر ها :
فرم مش، كرامبل , آفلاتوكسين ها , ليگنوسولفونات ها , كانولا گذاري , روش سيبالد
تاريخ نمايه سازي :
24/4/86
استاد داور :
حميد رضا رحماني، جواد كرامت
تاريخ ورود اطلاعات :
1396/02/31
چكيده فارسي :
به فارسي و انگليسي: قابل رويت در نسخه ديجيتال
چكيده انگليسي :
Evaluation of Nutritional Value of Protein Binder and Determination of the Best Level of its Substitution for Fish Meal in Broiler DietAbstractIn order to determine the effects of different levels of Amet protein binder 0 1 5 3 4 5 and 6 in substitution for fish meal on performance and digestibility of nutrients an experiment was conducted using 400 broiler chickens Ross strain with 5treatments of 4 replications The experiment was performed in a completelyrandomized design Weight gain feed consumption and feed conversion ratio weredetermined at the end of each period of experiment In addition the digestibility ofnutrients and digestible energy DE of whole diets were measured by ileal collectionmethod The results showed that treatment contained 6 Amet decreased feedconsumption at the starter period p 0 001 other treatment had not significantdifferent in this period Levels of 4 5 and 6 Amet significantly decreased feedconsumption in grower period p 0 001 Treatments had not effect on feedconsumption in finisher period Feed consumption was higher for 1 5 control and 3 Amet in diets during whole period respectively Weight gain decreased only fortreatment contained 6 Amet at the starter period At grower period treatmentcontained 1 5 Amet was showed greatest weight gain versus other treatments butthis different had not significant versus control treatment Addition 1 5 Amet versuscontrol treatment insignificantly increased weight gain in all periods of theexperiment In the starter period 1 5 Amet improved feed conversion ratio p 0 001 The 6 and 4 5 Amet in all periods of experiment and the finisherperiod increased feed conversion ratio respectively Treatment contained 1 5 and3 Amet increased protein efficiency ratio PER at the starter period In the growerperiod PER was no significantly different except treatment 6 Amet Treatmentscontained 4 5 and 6 Amet decreased PER at the finisher period Relative weight ofintestine and percent of abdominal fat were not significantly affected by treatments Treatment with 6 Amet increased the relative weight of liver p 0 05 Replacementof different levels of Amet except the treatment contained 6 Amet had notsignificant effect on percentage of carcass Meanwhile treatment didn t affectdigestibility of ash and DE The level of 1 5 Amet versus 6 Amet significantlyincreased digestibility of protein p 0 05 The levels of 0 1 5 and 3 Amet versus4 5 and 6 Amet significantly increased digestibility of fat p 0 001 It seams thatinclusion of 1 5 Amet binder in the diet can positively affect performance and DEof diet also provide apart of requirement of protein in broiler chickens
استاد راهنما :
جواد پوررضا، عبدالحسين سميع
استاد مشاور :
مهدي محمد علي پور
استاد داور :
حميد رضا رحماني، جواد كرامت
