پديد آورنده :
مروت اميري، علي
عنوان :
بررسي مديريت چرا و كنترل پروانه اي چرا در شهرستان كبودراهنگ با نگرشي به قوانين و مقررات
مقطع تحصيلي :
كارشناسي ارشد
گرايش تحصيلي :
بيابان زدايي
محل تحصيل :
اصفهان: دانشگاه صنعتي اصفهان، دانشكده منابع طبيعي
صفحه شمار :
پانزده، 236، [II]ص.: مصور، جدول، نمودار
يادداشت :
ص. ع. به فارسي و انگليسي
استاد راهنما :
حميد متين خواه
توصيفگر ها :
مرتعداري , مستثينات قانوني , دامگذاري
تاريخ نمايه سازي :
26/03/87
استاد داور :
احمد خاتون آبادي، محمدرضا وهابي
تاريخ ورود اطلاعات :
1396/03/06
رشته تحصيلي :
منابع طبيعي
دانشكده :
مهندسي منابع طبيعي
چكيده فارسي :
به فارسي و انگليسي: قابل رؤيت درنسخه ديجيتال
چكيده انگليسي :
238AbstractRange management is key element Because Range life is dependent on management approach thatgoverned the Range In this thesis we studied all national resources laws in 139 village Rangeauditory documents in 106 site convention organizer the subject of 56 th item of forest and Rangeprotection and utilization law about conflicting fields documents the documents about deviationfrom 44th item and 44 bis of forest and Range protection and utilization law analyzing andcomparison the credit of three protection projects in a 4 years period and at least studying andcontrolling the Range management plans at the kabudrahang Country one of the hameddan statetown four managerial period are determined It includes the period before Range nationalization the period between Range nationalization andRange survey time the period between Range survey and total Range plan development at leastthe period after total Range plan development In a period before Range nationalization in this county the ranges were governed by local feudal Based on a historical documents some part of Range were gifted by feudal like amir nezam and the village old timers views who remember the period before Range nationalization theRange were governed by feudal and because of their sensitivity about the way of using Rangeand the regulation which governed the animals entrance and exit every year a part of Range wasmanaged by guard But analyzing the Range survey documents shows that after Rangenationalizing and elimination of private owe ness for a long time a managerial gap and alsogovernmental gap was happen in Range even in some organizers it was more than 40 years thatperiod was called the period of Range managerial gap At the 3rd period due to governmental weakness that it could not develop and operate Range plansin every organizer by using the 1 st of 3rd item provision of Range protection and utilization law and the next revision at 1965 cena parlliment issuance grazing license Researches about grazing license shows government never have had suitable supervision on Range by the grazing license It is hardly ever seen that an grazing license was extended However thenatural resources organizations haven t cached the suitable Range management stage in someknown organizers But by analyzing different documents about transgressions dossier Inkabudrahang Range in a six years period shows that 77 documents were opened about deviation By analyzing dispersal location and time deviation clarified that in every year just 6 percent ofknown organizers supervised In this managerial period 16 78 percent of county Range weredeteriorated and their utility were changed rate The animal number existent to animal allowablewas increased 5 square and stocking rate in Range was 3 3 animal unit per hectare and forallowed animal was 0 652 animal per hectare All of this things shows the pressure on Range inthis county By developing Range plan for this county the management approach renewal wasexpected In this thesis by studying and analyzing 89 known organizer till 2004 this analysis showsthat developed plans because of a lots of social and economical problems and also managerialapproach which governed Range and the other hand due to high pressure on Range this plan hasnot influenced well This study shows that by 37 percent decreasing of existed animal in contrast with auditory period but in the other hand Range capacity decreased 31 percent in contrast with auditory period and the14 percent of this decrease was because of county Range quality lost Because decreased stockingrate in range from 0 652 animal unit per hectare in supervision period to 0 56 animal unit perhectare Results shows 82 percent of Range which had developed plan were in poor or very poorcondition And more than 85 percent of Range had decreasing trend According to the Range plan approximately 40 billion Rial is needed to county Range renewalduring 8 years It means every year 5 billion Rial is needed But in 2006 it wa
استاد راهنما :
حميد متين خواه
استاد داور :
احمد خاتون آبادي، محمدرضا وهابي